UrgoStart Plus Range details

Composition
Indications
Size and ordering codes
Instructions for use
Application Videos

TLC-NOSF, AN INNOVATION WITH PROVEN AND RECOGNISED EFFICACY
JWC Challenge studyIn 2012, the Journal of Wound Care published the CHALLENGE(8) study, demonstrating that TLC-NOSF treatment leads to a greater reduction in wound surface area compared to a neutral dressing.
COVER LANCETIn December 2018, The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology international medical journal published the EXPLORER(4) clinical trial, demonstrating that TLC-NOSF treatment heals 60% more patients compared to a neutral dressing and that the earlier TLC-NOSF treatment is started, the more effective it is(2).

JWC Reality studyThe REALITY(7) analysis, published in 2017 in the Journal of Wound Care, presents a compilation of eight observational studies conducted in more than 10,000 patients and shows that TLC-NOSF reduces the healing time of chronic wounds by an average of 100 days and that the earlier TLC-NOSF treatment is started, the more effective it is.
In 2020, the Journal of Wound Care published the last URGOSTART PLUS OBSERVATIONAL STUDY conducted in 1,140 patients, demonstrating that UrgoStart Plus is effective irrespective of the wound type, whatever the wound phase and however long it has been present(9).

HASThe HAS (French National Authority for Health) has granted the entire range a level III clinical added value (CAV)(10) something that is unprecedented for a dressing.
2018 Galien France medical device prizeThe URGO Group was awarded the 2018 Galien France medical device prize for UrgoStart®. Each year, this prestigious award recognises exceptional innovations in the field of health.
NICEIn January 2019, and reviewed in April 2023, the United Kingdom’s NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) recommended TLC-NOSF treatment for the wound care of diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers(11). The NICE recommendations support the fact that the UrgoStart® range has better results in terms of reducing wound healing time, improving patients’ quality of life and enabling significant savings for health authorities compared to neutral dressings.
IWGDF2019: IWGDF (International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot) guidelines This is the very first time that a dressing has been recommended by the IWGDF.(12)

UrgoStart: Urgo Medical | UrgoStart reduces ulcer healing time

 

References:

*Excluding dry necrosis.

**TLC-NOSF: Lipido-Colloid technology – Nano OligaSaccharide Factor (KSOS: Potassium octasulfate sucrose salt).

  1. Meaume S, Dissemond J, Addala A. Evaluation of two fibrous wound dressings for the management of leg ulcers: results of a European randomised controlled trial (EARTH RCT). J Wound Care 2014; 23: 3, 105–116.
  2. Sigal ML, Addala A, Maillard H, Chahim M, Sala F, Blaise S, Dalac S, Meaume S, Bohbot S, Tumba C, Tacca O. Clinical evaluation of a new TLC-NOSF dressing with poly-absorbent fibers for the local management of exuding leg ulcers, at the different stages of the healing process: Results from two multicentric, single-arm, prospective, open-label clinical trials. J Wound Care 2019: 28(3) :164-17
  3. “In vitro” study. Internal Report. Laboratoires URGO
  4. Edmonds M, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Alfayate-García JM, Martini J, Petit JM, Rayman G, Lobmann R, Uccioli L, Sauvadet A, Bohbot S, Kerihuel JC, Piaggesi A. Sucrose octasulfate dressing versus control dressing in patients with neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (Explorer): an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Mar;6(3):186-196.
  5. Edmonds M et al. Sucrose octasulfate dressing versus control dressing in patients with neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (Explorer): an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Mar; 6(3): 186-196.
  6. Lázaro-Martínez JL et al. Optimal wound closure of diabetic foot ulcers with early initiation of TLC-NOSF treatment: post-hoc analysis of Explorer. J Wound Care. 2019 Jun 2; 28(6): 358-367.
  7. Münter KC et al. The reality of routine practice: a pooled data analysis on chronic wounds treated with TLC-NOSF wound dressings. J Wound Care. 2017 Feb; 26 (Sup2): S4-S15. Erratum in: J Wound Care. 2017 Mar 2; 26(3): 153.
  8. Meaume S, Truchetet F, Cambazard F et al. A randomized, controlled, double-blind prospective trial with a Lipido-Colloid Technology-Nano-OligoSaccharide Factor wound dressing in the local management of venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2012; 20: 4, 500–511.
  9. Dissemond J, Lützkendorf S, Dietlein M, Neßeler I, Becker E, Möller U, Thomassin L, Bohbot S, Münter KC. Clinical evaluation of polyabsorbent TLC-NOSF dressings on chronic wounds: a prospective, observational, multicentre study of 1140 patients. J Wound Care. 2020 Jun 2;29(6):350-361. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.6.350. PMID: 32530781
  10. CAV lll: in non-infected (IDSA/IWGDF infection criteria) neuro-ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (non-critical ischaemia, in the granulation phase (sequential treatment
  11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), UrgoStart for treating leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg42, April 2023
  12. IWGDF – Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease – 2019