UrgoTul Range

The UrgoTul Family range of dressings are for patients whose skin needs that extra TLC. The Technology Lipido-Colloid (TLC) healing matrix:

  • Provides and maintains a moist environment to support wound healing
  • Ensures harm-free care for patients
 
UrgoTul waiting room

Give every patients that extra bit of TLC to support with wound healing

UrgoTul diagram

Mode of action where the TLC (Technology Lipido-Colloid) Healing Matrix is in contact with the wound

Specifically designed to improve clinical outcomes

improvesProvides and maintains a moist wound healing environment1,2,3,4
improves Stimulates fibroblast proliferation5,6
improvesPain-free removal8
improvesClinically evaluated on over 54,000 patients7
EASY TO USE: 3 FORMATS
UrgoTul
The contact layer
Can be cut Highly comfortable
Can be combined with secondary dressing
Healing Matrix
TLC Healing Matrix
  • Maintains a moist environment
  • Allows pain-free, atraumatic removal
UrgoTul Absorb
The non-bordered foam
Can be cut Can be combined with secondary dressing

absorbent polyurethane foam layer

Absorbent polyurethane foam

  • Protects the peri-wound skin against maceration
 
Healing Matrix

TLC Healing Matrix

  • Maintains a moist environment
  • Allows pain-free, atraumatic removal
UrgoTul Absorb Broder
The silicone bordered foam
Cannot be cut
Shower-proof

Silicone backing

Silicone backing

  • Easy to apply & Ready-to-use
  • Stays in place for up to 7 days
  • Shower-proof
 
Highliy absorbant layer

Highly* absorbant layer

  • Absorbs and retains exudate
 
absorbent polyurethane foam layer

Absorbent polyurethane foam

  • Protects the peri-wound skin against maceration
 
Healing Matrix

TLC Healing Matrix

  • Maintains a moist environment
  • Allows pain-free, atraumatic removal
Kind to skin
Traditional dressing vs UrgoTul
improves Good efficacy4
improves 100% patient comfort at dressing change10
improves 100% ease of removal 10
improves 100% patient comfort while the dressing was in place10
95%
of patients experienced reduced pain on removal
MAPP study (2004).9
BRITISH SKIN FOUNDATION ACCREDITATION

We are the only wound care company accredited by the British Skin Foundation
Recognised after a robust, independent review of our extensive research and clinical data

The accreditation demonstrates our commitment to creating products that are not detrimental to a patient’s skin health and our dedication to being the healing company.

1. UrgoStart for treating leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/mtg42, January 2019

2. IWGDF- Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease – 2019.

3. Edmonds M, Lázaro-Martínez JL, Alfayate-García JM, Martini J, Petit JM, Rayman G, Lobmann R, Uccioli L, Sauvadet A, Bohbot S, Kerihuel JC, Piaggesi A. Sucrose octasulfate dressing versus control dressing in patients with neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (Explorer): an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Mar;6(3):186-196.

4. Meaume S, Truchetet F, Cambazard F et al. A randomized, controlled, double-blind prospective trial with a Lipido-Colloid Technology-Nano-OligoSaccharide Factor wound dressing in the local management of venous leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2012; 20: 4, 500–511.

5. Meaume S, Dompmartin A, Lazareth I, Sigal M, Truchetet F, Sauvadet A, Bohbot S. Quality of life in patients with leg ulcers: results from CHALLENGE, a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Journal of Wound Care. 2017; 26 (7): 368-379.

6. Schmutz J.L. et al. Evaluation of the nano-oligosaccharide factor lipido-colloid matrix in the local management of venous leg ulcers : results of a randomised, controlled trial. Int Wound J 2008;5:172–182

7. Sigal ML, Addala A, Maillard H, Chahim M, Sala F, Blaise S, Dalac S, Meaume S, Bohbot S, Tumba C, Tacca O. Clinical evaluation of a new TLC-NOSF dressing with poly-absorbent fibers for the local management of exuding leg ulcers, at the different stages of the healing process: Results from two multicentric, single-arm, prospective, open-label clinical trials. J Wound Care 2019: 28(3) :164-175.

8. Münter KC, Meaume S, Augustin M, Senet P, Kérihuel J.C. The reality of routine practice: a pooled data analysis on chronic wounds treated with TLC-NOSF wound dressings. J Wound Care. 2017 Feb; 26 (Sup2): S4-S15. Erratum in: J Wound Care. 2017 Mar 2; 26(3): 153 

9. Dissemond J, Lützkendorf S, Dietlein M, Neßeler I, Becker E, Möller U, Thomassin L, Bohbot S, Münter KC. Clinical evaluation of polyabsorbent TLC-NOSF dressings on chronic wounds: a prospective, observational, multicentre study of 1140 patients. J Wound Care. 2020 Jun 2;29(6):350-361. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.6.350. PMID: 32530781.

10. Augustin M, Keuthage W, Lobmann R, Lützkendorf S, Groth H, Möller U, Thomassin L, Bohbot S, Dissemond J, Blome C. Clinical evaluation of UrgoStart Plus dressings in real-life conditions: results of a prospective multicentre study on 961 patients. J Wound Care. 2021 Dec 2;30(12):966-978. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.12.966. PMID: 34881999.

11. “In vitro” study. Internal Report. Laboratoires URGO.